Everything about Political Parties totally explained
A
political party is a
political organization that seeks to attain
political power within a
government, usually by participating in electoral campaigns. Parties often espouse a certain
ideology and vision, but may also represent a coalition among disparate interests.==Definitions==
In
political science several definitions of political parties exists. The first historical definitions of political parties concentrated on the institutional nature of parties (organized assembly) and on their functions (working for the national interest) and partisanship. In
Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontent, published in 1770,
Edmund Burke formulated the following definition of a political party: "an organized assembly of men, united for working together for the national interest, according to the particular principle they agreed upon."
In 1816,
Benjamin Constant formulated the ideological definition of parties, which since that time remained accurate only for those parties that belonged to the grand ideological families, but not for
opportunist or
pragmatic parties, concerned with access to power, regardless of the political doctrine or ideology. For him, a political party is "a reunion of men professing the same political doctrine."
Marxists used a definition related with the central axiom of their doctrine (politics as class struggle): "a political party is the organization of the most conscious elements of a social class."
Max Weber kept the function formulated by Burke (realization of a political ideal, but also enlarged the definition, in order to include parties animated by material interests. According to him, a party is "an associative relation, an affiliation based on free recruitment. Its goal is to ensure the power for its leaders within an institutionalized group, having as aim the realization of an ideal or obtaining material advantages for its militants."
After
World War II,
political scientists and other researchers concentrated more on the technical and electoral nature of parties. For
Anthony Downs, a political party is "a team of men seeking to control the governing apparatus by gaining offices in a duly constituted election".
Traditionally, political scientists have focused on the role of political parties as instruments of promoting candidacies in elections to public office. Crotty defines political parties as:
"A political party is a formally organized group that performs the functions of educating the public to acceptance of the system as well as the more immediate implications of policy concerns, that recruits and promotes individuals for public office, and that provides a comprehensive linkage function between the public and governmental decisionmakers."
Similarly, according to Coleman, a political party is:
"an association that competes with other similar associations in periodic elections in order to participate in formal government institutions and thereby influence and control the personnel and policy of government."
Moreover, in many countries political parties predates elections and
universal suffrage.
Suryadinata notes that in non-Western societies, standard Western definitions of political parties have limited usage. He urges that the criteria for should be the functions of an organization should be the essential aspect and that an organization might have the functions of a political party without formally identifying itself as a political party.
Party systems
Nonpartisan
In a
nonpartisan system, no official political parties exist, sometimes reflecting legal
restrictions on political parties. In nonpartisan elections, each candidate is eligible for office on her or his own merits. In nonpartisan legislatures, there are no typically formal party alignments within the legislature. The administration of
George Washington and the first few sessions of the
US Congress were nonpartisan. Washington also warned against political parties during his
Farewell Address. The
unicameral legislature of
Nebraska is the only state government body that's nonpartisan in the United States today. Many city and county governments are nonpartisan. In
Canada, the territorial legislatures of the
Northwest Territories and
Nunavut are nonpartisan. Nonpartisan elections and modes of governance are common outside of state institutions. Unless there are legal prohibitions against political parties, factions within nonpartisan systems often evolve into political parties.
Single dominant party
In
single-party systems, one political party is legally allowed to hold effective power. Although minor parties may sometimes be allowed, they're legally required to accept the leadership of the dominant party. This party may not always be identical to the government, although sometimes positions within the party may in fact be more important than positions within the government.
Communist states such as
China are some of the examples; others can be found in
Fascist states such as
Nazi Germany was between 1933 and 1945. The
single-party system is thus usually equated with
dictatorships and tyranny.
In
dominant-party systems, opposition parties are allowed, and there may be even a deeply established democratic tradition, but other parties are widely considered to have no real chance of gaining power. Sometimes, political, social and economic circumstances, and public opinion are the reason for others parties' failure. Sometimes, typically in countries with less of an established democratic tradition, it's possible the dominant party will remain in power by using
patronage and sometimes by
voting fraud. In the latter case, the definition between Dominant and single-party system becomes rather blurred. Examples of dominant party systems include the
People's Action Party in
Singapore and the
African National Congress in
South Africa. One party dominant systems also existed in
Mexico with the
Institutional Revolutionary Party until the 1990s, in the southern
United States with the
Democratic Party from the 1930s until the 1970s, and in
Indonesia with the
Golongan Karya (Party of the Functional Groups) from early 1970s until 1998.
Two dominant parties
Two-party systems are states such as the
United States and
Jamaica in which there are two political parties dominant to such an extent that electoral success under the banner of any other party is extremely difficult. One
right wing coalition party and one
left wing coalition party is the most common ideological breakdown in such a system but in two-party states political parties are traditionally
catch all parties which are ideologically broad and inclusive.
The
United Kingdom is widely considered a two-party state, though the
Liberal Democratic Party holds seats in the
British Parliament.
A
plurality voting system (such as that in the United States) usually leads to a two-party system, a relationship described by
Maurice Duverger and known as
Duverger's Law.
Multiple parties
Multi-party systems are systems in which more than two parties are serious contenders to participate in ruling.
Canada, the
Republic of Ireland and and the
United Kingdom are examples where there are two strong parties, with a third party that's electorally successful. This "third" party may frequently rank second in elections, and pose a threat to the other two parties, but has still never led the government. Such a party is particularly influential when its support or opposition sustains or ends a
minority government.
Finland is a rare case of a nation where three parties routinely hold top office. It is very rare for a country to have more than three parties who all have a roughly equal chance of independently forming government.
Colombia traditionally had a rather rigid two-party system country but after
2002 elections, the system has gone through significant changes.
More commonly, in cases where there are three or more parties, no one party is likely to gain power alone, and parties work with each other to form
coalition governments. This has been an emerging trend in the politics of the
Republic of Ireland and is almost always the case in
Germany on national and state level, and in some constituencies at the
communal level. The major drawback of any
coalition government is that it's potentially vulnerable to rapid changes and tends to lack stability.
Party funding
Political parties are funded by contributions from their membership and by individuals and organizations which share their political ideas or who stand to benefit from their activities. Political parties and
factions, especially those in government, are
lobbied vigorously by organizations, businesses and
special interest groups such as
trades unions. Money and gifts to a party, or its members, may be offered as incentives. In the United Kingdom, it has been alleged that
peerages have been awarded to contributors to party funds, the benefactors becoming members of the
Upper House of Parliament and thus being in a position to participate in the legislative process. Famously,
Lloyd George was found to have been selling peerages and to prevent such corruption in future, Parliament passed the
Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925 into law. Thus the outright sale of peerages and similar honours became a
criminal act, however some benefactors are alleged to have attempted to circumvent this by cloaking their contributions as loans, giving rise to the '
Cash for Peerages' scandal. Such activities have given rise to demands that the scale of donations should be capped. As the costs of electioneering escalate, so the demands made on party funds increases. In the UK some politicians are advocating that parties should be funded by the
State; a proposition that promises to give rise to interesting debate. Along with the increased scrutiny of donations there has been a long term contraction in party memberships in a number of western democracies which itself places more strains on funding. For example in the United Kingdom and Australia membership of the two main parties in 2006 is less than an 1/8 of what it was in 1950, despite significant increases in population over that period. In Ireland, elected representatives of the
Sinn Féin party take only the average industrial wage from their salary as a representative, while the rest goes into the party budget. Other incomes they may have are not taken into account. Elected representatives of the
Socialist Party (Ireland) take only the average industrial wage out of their entire earnings.
Some nations, such as
Australia, give political parties public funding for advertising purposes during election periods.
Colors and emblems for parties
» Main article: see political colour and List of political party symbols
Generally speaking, over the world, political parties associate themselves with colors, primarily for identification, especially for voter recognition during
elections.
Red usually signifies
leftist,
communist or
socialist parties.
Conservative parties generally use
blue or
black.
Pink sometimes signifies moderate
socialist.
Yellow is often used for
libertarianism or
classical liberalism.
Green is the color for
green parties,
Islamist parties and
Irish nationalist and
republican parties in Northern Ireland.
Orange is sometimes a color of nationalism, such as in
The Netherlands, in Israel with the
Orange Camp or with
Ulster Loyalists in
Northern Ireland; it's also a color of reform such as in
Ukraine. In the past,
Purple was considered the color of
royalty (like white), but today it's sometimes used for feminist parties. White also is associated with nationalism. "Purple Party" is also used as an academic hypothetical of an undefined party, as a centralist party in the United States (because purple is created from mixing the main parties' colours of red and blue) and as a highly idealistic "peace and love" party
(External Link
)-- in a similar vein to a Green Party, perhaps.
Black is generally associated with
fascist parties, going back to
Mussolini's blackshirts, but also with
Anarchism and
Christian democracy. Similarly,
brown is often associated with
Nazism, going back to the
Nazi Party's
brown-uniformed storm troopers.
Color associations are useful for mnemonics when
voter
illiteracy is significant. Another case where they're used is when it isn't desirable to make rigorous links to parties, particularly when
coalitions and s are formed between political parties and other organizations, for example:
Red Tory, "Purple" (Red-Blue) alliances,
Red-green alliances,
Blue-green alliances,
Pan-green coalitions, and
Pan-blue coalitions.
Political color schemes in the
United States diverge from international norms. Since 2000, red has become associated with the center-right
Republican Party and blue with the center-left
Democratic Party. However, unlike political color schemes of other countries, the parties didn't choose those colors; they were used in news coverage of 2000 election results and ensuing legal battle and caught on in popular usage.
The
emblem of socialist parties is often a red
rose held in a fist. Communist parties often use a
hammer to represent the worker, a
sickle to represent the farmer, or
both a hammer and a sickle to refer to both at the same time.
The emblem of
Nazism, the
swastika or
"hakenkreuz," has been adopted as a near-universal symbol for almost any organized hate group, even though it dates from more ancient times.
Symbols can be very important when the overall
electorate is illiterate. In the
Kenyan constitutional referendum, 2005, supporters of the constitution used the
banana as their symbol, while the "no" used an
orange.
International organizations of political parties
During the 19th and 20th century, many national political parties organized themselves into international organizations along similar policy lines. Notable examples are the
International Workingmen's Association (also called the First International), the
Socialist International (also called the Second International), the
Communist International (also called the Third International), and the
Fourth International, as organizations of
working class parties, or the
Liberal International (yellow),
Christian Democratic International and the
International Democrat Union (blue).
Worldwide green parties have recently established the
Global Greens. The Socialist International, the Liberal International, and the
International Democrat Union are all based in
London.
References
Bibliography
- Abizadeh, Arash. 2005. "Democratic Elections without Campaigns?
Normative Foundations of National Baha'i Elections." World Order Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 7-49.
- Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. London: Methuen.
- Gunther, Richard and Larry Diamond. 2003. "Species of Political Parties: A New Typology," Party Politics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 167-199.
- Neumann, Sigmund (ed.). 1956. Modern Political Parties. IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Redding, Robert. 2004. Hired Hatred. RCI.
- Sutherland, Keith. 2004. The Party's Over. Imprint Academic. ISBN 0-907845-51-7
- Ware, Alan. 1987. Citizens, Parties and the State: A Reappraisal. Princeton University Press.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Political Parties'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://political_party.totallyexplained.com">Political party Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |